Auditing · Topic 4
Internal Control, Internal Check, and Internal Audit Quiz
Work through 25 multiple-choice questions, one at a time. Submit each answer for feedback. At the end, review your score and see which concepts to revisit.
Your quiz report
Question-by-question review
Show the answer key
- Segregation of duties Combined duties can let a person conceal a theft.
- Preventive control The control is designed to prevent payment before authorization conditions are met.
- Detective control Review can identify problems after amounts have been recorded.
- Internal audit objectivity Operating a control can impair objectivity when later assessing it.
- Compensating control Independent oversight may reduce risk when full segregation is impracticable.
- Separate custody, recording, and independent reconciliation where feasible Combined duties can let a person conceal a theft.
- Test that mismatches actually block payment and check override access The control is designed to prevent payment before authorization conditions are met.
- Inspect the review’s timing, thresholds and follow-up Review can identify problems after amounts have been recorded.
- Assign control ownership to management and protect independent evaluation Operating a control can impair objectivity when later assessing it.
- Arrange a timely owner review against independently sourced records Independent oversight may reduce risk when full segregation is impracticable.
- Access roles and independently signed reconciliations Separate custody, recording, and independent reconciliation where feasible.
- System configuration and documented rejected invoice tests Test that mismatches actually block payment and check override access.
- Signed review reports and records of resolved anomalies Inspect the review’s timing, thresholds and follow-up.
- Internal audit charter and documented responsibility assignments Assign control ownership to management and protect independent evaluation.
- Owner annotations and bank statements obtained separately Arrange a timely owner review against independently sourced records.
- Combined duties can let a person conceal a theft Access roles and independently signed reconciliations would support this assessment.
- The control is designed to prevent payment before authorization conditions are met System configuration and documented rejected invoice tests would support this assessment.
- Review can identify problems after amounts have been recorded Signed review reports and records of resolved anomalies would support this assessment.
- Operating a control can impair objectivity when later assessing it Internal audit charter and documented responsibility assignments would support this assessment.
- Independent oversight may reduce risk when full segregation is impracticable Owner annotations and bank statements obtained separately would support this assessment.
- Giving the cashier an additional signature field to approve their own work Combined duties can let a person conceal a theft.
- Assuming the rule works without testing exceptions and overrides The control is designed to prevent payment before authorization conditions are met.
- Counting a signature alone as proof that anomalies were investigated Review can identify problems after amounts have been recorded.
- Treating direct ownership of procurement approval as part of independent assurance Operating a control can impair objectivity when later assessing it.
- Assuming a small team eliminates the need for oversight Independent oversight may reduce risk when full segregation is impracticable.
These cases use general auditing principles. Apply the relevant local law and professional standards when evaluating a real engagement. Reference: IAASB standards and pronouncements.
